What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

movies are cool. here is a place to talk about how cool they are. or maybe how much they suck, sometimes. like that fucking piece of shit 'mac and me'. worst fucking movie ever, a two-hour ad for fucking coca-cola.

Moderators: Zero, John Madden, Bob Ross, General Zod, Richard Simmons, Batman

User avatar
RoIIo Tomassi
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2536
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:09 am
Location: Hollywood

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by RoIIo Tomassi »

Brain, face, spinal cord, and some rudimentary organs(like a stomach) to keep the organics alive. They also managed to save an arm, but the OCP guys agreed on full body prosthesis. So they lost the arm.
They were basically using the brain as a hard drive.

Speaking of the "dated" effects, if you ever get a chance to watch the Criterion DVD they've got some great documentaries about how they did a lot of the stop-motion ED-209 stuff. Great stuff.
"Say Jim! Whoo! That is a bad outfit! Whoooo!"
User avatar
vynsane
master of the universe
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: in my quiet place, punch-dancing out my rage
Contact:

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by vynsane »

Senor JabbaJohnL wrote:It's incredibly dated to the late '80s in terms of the effects, politics, and overall style, so I can't say I blame them for wanting to take the idea and update it to the modern world (though I'm sure that wasn't the original intention of the remake).
as long as they maintain the Amurican Robot Jesus angle...
Life is short. STUNT IT!
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by anarky »

Yeah, I don't watch any science fiction movies that have anything that date them. There was this movie on the other day, something about a farmboy on a desert planet who joined an old man and some robots to get a ride with a smuggler and a bigfoot so they could save this princess from a black robot or cyborg or something with magic powers. Anyway, I couldn't get past those shitty 1977 hairdos and references to "data tapes," so I gave up trying to watch it. :P
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
User avatar
vynsane
master of the universe
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: in my quiet place, punch-dancing out my rage
Contact:

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by vynsane »

also, death stars are SOOOO 70's...
Life is short. STUNT IT!
User avatar
Diabolical
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Doofenshmirtz Evil, Inc.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Diabolical »

I was just reminded of this:
Attachments
terrorist.jpg
terrorist.jpg (240.2 KiB) Viewed 3946 times
"As they say in China, 'Arrivederci'!"
Image
*For the creation of the Golden Deuce Award.
Senor JabbaJohnL
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Senor JabbaJohnL »

RoIIo Tomassi wrote:Speaking of the "dated" effects, if you ever get a chance to watch the Criterion DVD they've got some great documentaries about how they did a lot of the stop-motion ED-209 stuff. Great stuff.
I did like this effect. The fact that it couldn't walk down stairs due to its giant feet was pretty goofy, though.
anarky wrote:Yeah, I don't watch any science fiction movies that have anything that date them. There was this movie on the other day, something about a farmboy on a desert planet who joined an old man and some robots to get a ride with a smuggler and a bigfoot so they could save this princess from a black robot or cyborg or something with magic powers. Anyway, I couldn't get past those shitty 1977 hairdos and references to "data tapes," so I gave up trying to watch it. :P
Huh, sounds interesting. :P But aside from the haircuts and some of the technology, the fact that Star Wars isn't set on Earth or anywhere near the "modern day" makes such things easier to overlook, at least to me; they don't overwhelm any other elements. In Robocop, things like the "futuristic" cars and homes are immediately recognizable as decades out of date (the SUX was supposed to look shitty and old, but the top-of-the-line police cars don't look much better at this point). If they had presented it as the way things were (like in something like ET, which at least fully takes place in the time it was made) then it would have been less unintentionally funny. I guess it was the combination of the late Cold War era politics, '80s style presented as future-style, actual futuristic design elements (like the bulletproof vests) clearly designed in the '80s, and extremely '80s things like the cocaine use and evil corporations. It's difficult for any movie to make itself look timeless, and things like fashions are tweaked to still make them palatable for audiences (even The Godfather always reminds me more of the '70s than the '40s), so while it's not a bad thing, it's definitely still very, very dated.
Shit. I can't think of a good signature.
User avatar
Diabolical
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Doofenshmirtz Evil, Inc.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Diabolical »

The original Total Recall has a part where the bad guys are tracking Arnold with a GPS-type thing...and its the size of a 80s portable tv.
"As they say in China, 'Arrivederci'!"
Image
*For the creation of the Golden Deuce Award.
User avatar
RoIIo Tomassi
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2536
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:09 am
Location: Hollywood

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by RoIIo Tomassi »

Wargames is the king of looking dated. I literally laugh out loud every time I see him whip out those giant ass floppy discs. :lol:
"Say Jim! Whoo! That is a bad outfit! Whoooo!"
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Ran »

Or how about that old modem that actually requires taking the land line receiver and hooking it to the computer?
User avatar
Diabolical
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Doofenshmirtz Evil, Inc.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Diabolical »

Or early 90s sci-fi movies that use VHS tapes. Johnny Pnenomic comes to mind.

Or Alien, where the computer screens are black with green lettering.


This "Technology of Future Past" discussion sounds rather inane.
"As they say in China, 'Arrivederci'!"
Image
*For the creation of the Golden Deuce Award.
User avatar
vynsane
master of the universe
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: in my quiet place, punch-dancing out my rage
Contact:

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by vynsane »

Senor JabbaJohnL wrote:and extremely '80s things like the cocaine use and evil corporations.
you're right, because there's no more of either of those things :lol: :lol: :lol:
Diabolical wrote:This "Technology of Future Past" discussion sounds rather inane.
definitely - and can go way back in time to the era when they thought we'd have flying cars by now, and further...
Life is short. STUNT IT!
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by anarky »

IIRC, The Jetsons takes place 40 years from now.
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
User avatar
RoIIo Tomassi
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2536
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:09 am
Location: Hollywood

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by RoIIo Tomassi »

More in the "Remake" than the "Pathetic" side, the new Lone Ranger teaser.




It doesn't show much, and thus it hard to get excited. But it's the Writers, Director, Producer, and Star of the Pirates films. So, Benefit of the Doubt is heartily given.
"Say Jim! Whoo! That is a bad outfit! Whoooo!"
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Ran »

anarky wrote:IIRC, The Jetsons takes place 40 years from now.
Do you think it would tick anyone off at other websites if it was suggested that Cloud City was Jetson's rip off?
User avatar
Diabolical
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Doofenshmirtz Evil, Inc.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Post by Diabolical »

2 more technology of future past:
Lost in Space took place in 1997, IIRC and there was an old Looney Tunes where Elmer Fudd has a Rip van Winkle experience and wakes up in like 1996.


And we're getting awful close to BTTF's 2015.
"As they say in China, 'Arrivederci'!"
Image
*For the creation of the Golden Deuce Award.
Post Reply